W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2008

Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 22:07:29 +1300
Message-ID: <11e306600811130107m20fe1001o5b53c251d3627d9a@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Levantovsky, Vladimir" <Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotypeimaging.com>
Cc: "Dave Crossland" <dave@lab6.com>, www-style@w3.org
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:05 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>wrote:

> The details of the obfuscation are irrelevant in practice. Tools will do
> all the work. It's no harder to run "mtx-unwrap" than "xyz-unwrap" (or
> "gunzip", for that matter).
>

Irrelevant to user behaviour, I should say.

The obfuscation details obviously are relevant if they're a pain to
implement, or incompatible with some fonts, or patented in GPL-incompatible
ways, etc.

Rob
-- 
"He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities;
the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are
healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his
own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah
53:5-6]
Received on Thursday, 13 November 2008 09:08:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:17 GMT