W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2008

Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal

From: Gustavo Ferreira <gustavo.ferreira@hipertipo.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:44:50 -0200
Message-Id: <7105084C-B9F4-42C8-961F-D44862382554@hipertipo.net>
To: www-style@w3.org
Op Nov 11, 2008, om 5:25 PM heeft Tab Atkins Jr. het volgende  
geschreven:

> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Gustavo Ferreira  
> <gustavo.ferreira@hipertipo.net> wrote:
> Op Nov 10, 2008, om 12:44 PM heeft Tab Atkins Jr. het volgende  
> geschreven:
>
>> Especially when it's been proven that high-quality type can and  
>> will be produced in a free-as-in-liberty fashion.
>
> i don't think this has been proven at all.
>
> could you please give examples to back up your claim?
>
> I'm very reluctant to point to any directly, simply because the  
> possible examples are so numerous and it's so easy to reject  
> particular fonts as "not high-quality enough".  Just do a search  
> for them - there's tons of free fonts out there, and many are of  
> nice quality.

please, make an effort and name some examples -- the reason i ask is  
because i can't think of none.

most 'free-as-in-liberty' fonts i know of were _not_ developed in  
'free-as-in-liberty' fashion: vera, gentium, liberation, droid, gfs  
fonts -- they were all produced by professional type-designers/ 
foundries in a 'closed' fashion, and at some point distributed under  
a free-license. that's definitely not the same thing...

regards,
- gustavo.
Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2008 19:45:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:16 GMT