W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2008

Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 12:36:12 +1300
Message-ID: <11e306600811101536v479107r8435f81a3930d9bc@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Levantovsky, Vladimir" <Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotypeimaging.com>
Cc: "David Woolley" <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>, www-style@w3.org
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Levantovsky, Vladimir <
Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotypeimaging.com> wrote:

> For my own education - how do you get around this when similar issues occur
> with other technologies that are patent-protected and licensed according W3C
> RF policy?
>

I'm not aware of other technologies that are W3C standards,
patent-protected, where the RF license carries field-of-use restrictions. I
didn't even realize that the W3C policy allowed that.

Rob
-- 
"He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities;
the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are
healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his
own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah
53:5-6]
Received on Monday, 10 November 2008 23:36:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:16 GMT