W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2008

Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal

From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 21:56:12 +0000
Message-ID: <4918ADFC.5080702@david-woolley.me.uk>
To: www-style@w3.org

Levantovsky, Vladimir wrote:

>     <VL>
>     This is exactly the point! The fact that the compression algorithm
>     is patent-protected makes no difference for any applications
>     (browsers, web tools, you name it) that implement W3C Recommendation
>     - it's been offered on W3C RF terms. OSes will never see compressed

It prevents the use of GPLed (V2, at least) code in those browsers, as
GPLed code must be licenced for all uses, not just for web browser use;
the only let out in GPL is that you can restrict distribution to
countries that don't enforce the patent royalties.

>     fonts - UA will decompress them and deliver to OS font engine as
>     regular OpenType fonts. However, if someone implements a standalone
>
-- 
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Monday, 10 November 2008 21:57:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:16 GMT