W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2008

Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 16:15:38 +0000 (UTC)
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Phinney <tphinney@adobe.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0811071615010.1041@hixie.dreamhostps.com>

On Fri, 7 Nov 2008, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, Thomas Phinney wrote:
> > > I believe this isn't DRM, but DRE (and even more so in the new
> > > "compromise proposal"). But of course calling it DRM makes it easier for
> > > W3C folks to have a knee-jerk reaction against it.
> >
> > DRE is evil. Easily-circumvented DRE is pointless and evil.
> 
> Wait a moment now, I don't think one can reasonably consider DRE evil.  
> At least, not anymore evil than copyright itself.

Your definition of DRE is obviously different to Thomas' definition. I was 
referring to the idea of obfuscating font files, regardless of what 
acronym you give it.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 7 November 2008 16:16:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:16 GMT