- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 16:15:38 +0000 (UTC)
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Thomas Phinney <tphinney@adobe.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, 7 Nov 2008, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, Thomas Phinney wrote: > > > I believe this isn't DRM, but DRE (and even more so in the new > > > "compromise proposal"). But of course calling it DRM makes it easier for > > > W3C folks to have a knee-jerk reaction against it. > > > > DRE is evil. Easily-circumvented DRE is pointless and evil. > > Wait a moment now, I don't think one can reasonably consider DRE evil. > At least, not anymore evil than copyright itself. Your definition of DRE is obviously different to Thomas' definition. I was referring to the idea of obfuscating font files, regardless of what acronym you give it. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 7 November 2008 16:16:13 UTC