W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2008

Re: Selectors Tests

From: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 20:22:00 -0800
Message-ID: <4913C268.5090405@terrainformatica.com>
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
CC: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Patrick Garies <pgaries@fastmail.us>, www-style@w3.org

Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:
>> :disabled  != :not(:enabled)
>> :enabled  != :not(:disabled)
>> not(:enabled)  && :not(:disabled) == true
> 
> This is desired, yes.
> 
>> :enabled  && :disabled == true
> 
> This can't happen.

This needs to be specified then.

:enabled and :disabled are mutually exclusive in all domains CSS is
aimed to serve.

It means that either one :enabled or :disabled is just enough for 
practical needs.

input:not(:enabled) { color:gray; }

why do you need :disabled then?

-- 
Andrew Fedoniouk.

http://terrainformatica.com
Received on Friday, 7 November 2008 05:22:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:16 GMT