RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts

I wrote:

> 2) The folks who make the retail fonts want exactly the two kinds of
> protections in question, which requirements are met by EOT and
> apparently by the compromise proposal as well. The minimum requirement
> seems to be: URL info in the font, plus just enough obfuscation that
> the font can't work in Mac or Windows without pre-processing. That
> minimum will get a critical mass of retail fonts available: many font
> makers would like a LOT MORE than this

That last bit should read "many web developers/designers would like a LOT MORE than this..."

Cheers,

T