W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2008

Re: Font MIME types

From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 13:04:02 +0100
Message-ID: <482EC9B2.4070507@david-woolley.me.uk>
To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>

Håkon Wium Lie wrote:

>   Content-Type: font/truetype
>   Content-Type: font/opentype
>   Content-Type: font/type1
>   Content-Type: font/type3
>   Content-Type: font/cff
> 
> Do these make sense? Which other formats should be listed?

SVG, various X font formats, Windows bitmap fonts formats, etc.

As you are distinguishing between type1 and type3 PostScript fonts, you 
probably need to distinguish between EOT and basic OpenType.  (The only 
reason you would want to distinguish between type1 and type3 is for 
content negotiation, so you may want to consider the effect on the 
length of the HTTP Accept header.


-- 
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Saturday, 17 May 2008 12:03:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:06 GMT