W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2008

Re: [css3-background] box-shadow syntax

From: Brad Kemper <brkemper@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 07:55:40 -0700
Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-Id: <EAB0914C-0BD0-4265-B94B-DB0FEE904223@comcast.net>
To: Eli Morris-Heft <dai@doublefishstudios.com>
Here is my mockup:

http://bradclicks.com/cssplay/Shadows.html


On May 10, 2008, at 10:42 AM, Brad Kemper wrote:

>
> On May 9, 2008, at 10:59 PM, Eli Morris-Heft wrote:
>
>> You can find a quick-and-dirty mockup at http://www.doublefishstudios.com/~dai/boxes.png 
>>  . I hope this is what everyone else is visualizing... There is no  
>> example for a non-zero offset + non-zero spread case, because  
>> Fireworks can't do that without extra effort. It should be pretty  
>> easy to visualize, though.
>
> Thanks for putting that up. I didn't have further time to even look  
> at this until today, and I am currently in  a bit of a rush, so I  
> will put up my own later. It will be essentially the same, except  
> for blur radius. Yours seems to do something a little different than  
> what I am used to, and seems to force a certain amount of unblurred  
> shadow to be shown when there is offset. That doesn't look as  
> natural to my eyes, and seems to be more limiting. In the PhotoShop/ 
> spec way of handling blur, your way could still be simulated, I  
> think, by using spread.
>
> I will post one later today to show the differences.
Received on Monday, 12 May 2008 14:56:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:06 GMT