W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2008

Re: CSS Module Priority

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 20:33:02 -0700
Message-ID: <482122EE.9010002@inkedblade.net>
To: "Linss, Peter" <peter.linss@hp.com>
CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>

Linss, Peter wrote:
> 
> The levels are defined as:
> 
> High: At least two implementers have expressed very strong interest.
> 
> Medium: At least two implementers have expressed medium or better interest.
> 
> Low: At least two implementers have expressed low or better interest.
> 
>...
> 
> Medium Priority              
> 
>                 CSS Snapshot 2007
> 
>                 CSS Namespaces

CSS Namespaces is already implemented by 2+ implementations. How does that
not express strong interest in implementing the module? Or was your question
"how interested are you in seeing this spec" rather than "how interested are
you in implementing this spec", because the Namespaces spec is pretty boring...

CSS Snapshot 2007 is a meta-spec. It doesn't define a technology that needs
to be implemented, it puts the various pieces in context. It should advance
in parallel with the specs it references, all of which -- aside from CSS
Namespaces -- are in your "high priority" list.

~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 7 May 2008 03:33:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:06 GMT