W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2008

Re: WebFonts ready for use

From: Dave Crossland <dave@lab6.com>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 10:33:04 +0100
Message-ID: <2285a9d20805010233l15f480dfic220e3b4bd13f7e5@mail.gmail.com>
To: "David Woolley" <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
Cc: www-style@w3.org
2008/5/1 David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>:
>
> Patrick Garies wrote:
>>
>> This could be dealt with by adding a shareability flag and/or domain
>> white‚Äźlisting mechanism to CSS3 Web Fonts that could prevent a Web font from
>> being shared indirectly.
>
> That's what EOT fonts already do, and it is that model that people are
> rejecting in this thread.  A

>  EOT basically is a domain whitelisting wrapper.

I think it is dramatically more than that; because of the encryption,
EOT is an "effective technological measure" under any applicable law
fulfilling obligations under article 11 of the WIPO copyright treaty
adopted on 20 December 1996, or similar laws prohibiting or
restricting circumvention of such measures. This prohibits its
implementation in free software web browsers, and therefore must be
rejected.

Webservers already have a mechanism for domain whitelisting of images
to deter deep-linking them - by checking that the HTTP Referrer
headers match the domain names they serve pages from. This can
obviously work just the same way for domain whitelisting of fonts.

-- 
Regards,
Dave
Received on Thursday, 1 May 2008 09:33:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:06 GMT