- From: Ben Darlow <ben@kapowaz.net>
- Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 02:56:33 -0500
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 28 Mar 2008, at 23:24, Brad Kemper wrote: > I don't think you would have to do that. The way I imagine it, if > you want it to have horizontal scaling but not vertical, then you > would just give the img a fixed height (or leave it at its > intrinsic height) and let the width be based on percentage of its > container's width. > ... > Do you foresee any problem with this? Makes perfect sense to me! I think that's a good way of eliminating the need for a new attribute. ~B
Received on Saturday, 29 March 2008 07:57:15 UTC