- From: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:28:40 -0700
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- cc: www-style@w3.org, Garrett Smith <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com>, Andy Clarke <malarkey@malarkey.co.uk>
fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net > Garrett Smith wrote: > > Alan Gresley wrote: > >> Here is a few extracts from Fantaisai' blog, "Pulling Back the Curtain: Opening up the CSS Working Group": > > ... > > > > The CSS WG has so many problems on so many levels, technically, > > process-wise, and the whole pay-to-play leading to corruption. > > The topic of this mailing list is TECHNICAL discussion of style sheets. > This thread is very off-topic. If you have technical comments, as dbaron > said, please post them in a new thread. Otherwise, find another forum for > your comments. These are my subject lines. # RE: [CSS2.1-9.5] [CSS2.1-9.4.1] Block formatting context and Floats (Tuesday, 15 January) # [CSS2.1-9.5] [CSS2.1-9.4.1] Block formatting context and Floats (Tuesday, 15 January) # RE: CSS2.1 9.4.1 Block formatting context (was CSS WG - Pulling Back the Curtains) (Friday, 28 March) > You can post a link to that forum here, but I do not want > to be discussing process issues on this mailing list. If you want to > complain about the CSSWG, please go post on Andy Clarke's blog, not here. [...] > Thanks. > > ~fantasai So the only process for formal complain about the CSS WG is via Andy Clarke blog. That is ridiculous. Alan
Received on Friday, 28 March 2008 19:29:18 UTC