W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2008

RE: Tech discussion CSS (was CSS WG - Pulling Back the Curtains)

From: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:28:40 -0700
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
cc: www-style@w3.org, Garrett Smith <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com>, Andy Clarke <malarkey@malarkey.co.uk>
Message-ID: <20080328122840.f8d1e42eb1f8db40312f41775502f7f0.cdd387bbfc.wbe@email.secureserver.net>

fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net


> Garrett Smith wrote:
>  > Alan Gresley wrote:
> >> Here is a few extracts from Fantaisai' blog, "Pulling Back the Curtain: Opening up the CSS Working Group":
> > ...
> > 
> > The CSS WG has so many problems on so many levels, technically,
> > process-wise, and the whole pay-to-play leading to corruption.
> 
> The topic of this mailing list is TECHNICAL discussion of style sheets.
> This thread is very off-topic. If you have technical comments, as dbaron
> said, please post them in a new thread. Otherwise, find another forum for
> your comments.


These are my subject lines.

# RE: [CSS2.1-9.5] [CSS2.1-9.4.1] Block formatting context and Floats (Tuesday, 15 January)
# [CSS2.1-9.5] [CSS2.1-9.4.1] Block formatting context and Floats (Tuesday, 15 January)
# RE: CSS2.1 9.4.1 Block formatting context (was CSS WG - Pulling Back the Curtains) (Friday, 28 March)


> You can post a link to that forum here, but I do not want
> to be discussing process issues on this mailing list. If you want to
> complain about the CSSWG, please go post on Andy Clarke's blog, not here.
[...]
> Thanks.
> 
> ~fantasai


So the only process for formal complain about the CSS WG is via Andy Clarke blog. That is ridiculous.


Alan
Received on Friday, 28 March 2008 19:29:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:02 GMT