W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2008

Re: CSS WG - Pulling Back the Curtains

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 07:49:31 -0700
To: "Alan Gresley" <alan@css-class.com>, www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.t8qd4tvu64w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>

On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 03:54:35 -0700, Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>  
> The above was written on the 23rd of Jun 2007 (the rate of change is  
> remarkable). I only have one question at this point. Does CSS2.1 have  
> holes in it that are just so big that they are just being overlooked on  
> purpose?

There are things that are not adequately covered, such as the table model.  
But that's not overlooked on purpose, that's just delayed for CSS3 to  

Things that the WG does consider solvable for CSS 2.1 are fixed, such as  
the various parsing issues raised on this list. Furthermore, since all  
technical discussion happens in public and we've two implementors who do  
their work in public intentionally hiding "big holes" seems rather tricky.  
Is there a particular reason why you raise this concern?

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Friday, 28 March 2008 14:50:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:27:35 UTC