> We then propose to restrict whitespaces in the nth-child()'s argument > to ONLY after the '(' and before the ')'. Since this is not the common > practice in CSS - whitespace is usually allowed everywhere - we would > like the web designers community to let us know if they think it's an > acceptable compromise or if you think for instance that web authors > will make a lot of mistakes putting invalid whitespaces inside the > expression. This looks like an acceptable solution since a) it does not affect all “:nth-child()” use cases (like “tr:nth-child(odd)”) and b) will be less of a problem anyway assuming that less experienced web developers will be less likely to use this pseudo-class at all. (Hapless inconsistency though.) -- Jens Meiert http://meiert.com/en/Received on Tuesday, 11 March 2008 19:05:23 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:02 GMT