- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 12:00:07 -0800
- To: www-style@w3.org
L. David Baron wrote: > >> Chapter_12/content-white-space-001.htm is incorrect for the same >> reason as Chapter_4/escaped-newline-001.htm (above). > > To respond to myself here, the spec suggests *informatively* in two > places that :before and :after should default to pre-line (although > in one of them, for HTML only, which seems bizarre): > http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/sample.html > http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/text.html#propdef-white-space > but it never says so normatively. > > If we actually want this behavior, it should be stated normatively > (and then the tests would be correct). If we don't, we should > probably take out the examples. Agreed. Recorded as an issue 37 http://csswg.inkedblade.net/spec/css2.1#issue-37 Do you have a preference? ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 5 March 2008 19:59:42 UTC