Paul Nelson (ATC) wrote: > Would you consider common use to be word processors and other text > editors that support strikethrough? I would consider them a subset of "common use". With regards to strike-through in particular, I'd strongly consider handwriting (or at least hand-striking) conventions as well. When considering good typographic behavior, I'd give a higher weight to high-quality typeset *output* than to the options available in a word processor or even those in a high-end typesetting program. ~fantasaiReceived on Wednesday, 5 March 2008 09:29:55 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 5 March 2008 09:29:55 GMT