Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 18:00:00 +0200, fantasai > <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >> Ingo Chao wrote: >>> Note: For absolutely positioned elements whose containing block is >>> based on a block-level element, the percentage is calculated with >>> respect to the width of the padding box of that element. >>> Why was this note not added to 10.5 Content height? >> >> Recorded as Issue 50, assumed editorial. >> http://csswg.inkedblade.net/spec/css2.1#issue-50 >> >> The note was added on 3 March 2005, along with the previous sentence >> about percentage widths for shrink-wrapped elements. > > This note looks similar to the ones being removed by issue-43. Is it > still valid? Good catch. It's valid but has the same problem, and should probably be tweaked to remove "whose containing block is based on a block-level element". ~fantasaiReceived on Monday, 16 June 2008 18:28:15 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:07 GMT