W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2008

Re: [CSS21] computed value of 'font-weight' is not precisely defined

From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 08:31:57 -0700
To: Andrey Mikhalev <amikhal@abisoft.spb.ru>
Cc: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <20080611153157.GA6362@pickering.dbaron.org>

On Wednesday 2008-06-11 17:07 +0400, Andrey Mikhalev wrote:
> imo both cases do not achieve desired effect, i.e. prevent weight  
> inversion on font-family swing.
> if you won't bother with it, just return back to pretty simple CSS2
> definition.

So you're saying you actually know what the CSS2 definition says
should happen in these cases?  As far as I can tell it's
self-contradictory (or maybe ambiguous).

> and i think w/o 'used font-family' thing on computation stage you cannot  
> solve the problem; then no reason to keep neither sequence nor count of  
> relative values.
> so, why particular [weird?] impl must be freezed in spec?

Which 'used font-family'?  There are more than one.


L. David Baron                                 http://dbaron.org/
Mozilla Corporation                       http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Wednesday, 11 June 2008 15:32:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:27:37 UTC