On Wednesday 2008-06-11 17:07 +0400, Andrey Mikhalev wrote: > imo both cases do not achieve desired effect, i.e. prevent weight > inversion on font-family swing. > if you won't bother with it, just return back to pretty simple CSS2 > definition. So you're saying you actually know what the CSS2 definition says should happen in these cases? As far as I can tell it's self-contradictory (or maybe ambiguous). > and i think w/o 'used font-family' thing on computation stage you cannot > solve the problem; then no reason to keep neither sequence nor count of > relative values. > so, why particular [weird?] impl must be freezed in spec? Which 'used font-family'? There are more than one. -David -- L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/Received on Wednesday, 11 June 2008 15:32:45 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:07 GMT