W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2008

[CSS21] Are vendor-specific extensions invalid?

From: Ingo Chao <i4chao@googlemail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 13:22:09 +0200
Message-ID: <879e9bc50807270422v4ab36219x4bf467e5420fa58@mail.gmail.com>
To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>


Are vendor-specific extensions invalid? Or are they valid because the
format they should have is defined in the specification, so the
grammar is correct?

Thanks
-- 
Ingo Chao
http://www.satzansatz.de/

Received on Sunday, 27 July 2008 11:38:10 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis: "Re: [CSS21] Are vendor-specific extensions invalid?"
Previous message: Andrew Fedoniouk: "Re: Parent Combinator / Parent pseudo-class"
Next in thread: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis: "Re: [CSS21] Are vendor-specific extensions invalid?"
Reply: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis: "Re: [CSS21] Are vendor-specific extensions invalid?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:10 GMT