On Friday 25 July 2008 17:33, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > If it wouldn't break too much on the current web (ignoring the > possibility that the average current website would be displayed on a > projector or something, because it really wouldn't in normal use), > I'd prefer a px to just be identical to whatever unit browsers use > when an author specifies the width/height of an <img> (I suppose this > is a device pixel?). Actually, if the browser uses CSS, then the pixels of a raster image have the size of a 'px', not a device pixel. (That's not clear in the current specification, but the WG decided to put it in the errata[1]. At some point we will publish a new CR with the errata folded in, or maybe we'll publish a Rec first and put the errata in the second revision, CSS 2.2...) [1] http://www.w3.org/Style/css2-updates/CR-CSS21-20070719-errata.html#s.3.1 > When Units Level 3 comes in and gives me vw and > vh units I'll be able to switch away from pixels virtually entirely, > which will be nice. Bert -- Bert Bos ( W 3 C ) http://www.w3.org/ http://www.w3.org/people/bos W3C/ERCIM bert@w3.org 2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93 +33 (0)4 92 38 76 92 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, FranceReceived on Friday, 25 July 2008 16:54:11 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:10 GMT