W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2008

Re: Scoped style sheets.

From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 08:14:09 +0100
Message-ID: <487C4E41.8080408@david-woolley.me.uk>
To: www-style <www-style@w3.org>

Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:
> 

> 
> Normal specificity rules will simply not work.
> To be able to overweight global styles you will end
> up with something like this:
> 

Note that global rules have to be able to overrule scoped ones, 
otherwise you have lost the key requirement of the cascade that the 
consumer has ultimate authority.

(One thing that concerns me about the whole use case is that it is based 
on embedding what are really separete resources, for reasons that have 
to do with ensuring that advertisements are seen, not to do with the 
natural structure of the information.  However the want to meet 
commercial constraints is so endemic these days, that I don't think I'd 
win such an argument amongst implementors.  The real solution would be 
to make object work!)
-- 
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Tuesday, 15 July 2008 07:12:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:10 GMT