Re: Question/Suggestion : min-left, min-right etc...

On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Kevin Cannon <kevin@multiblah.com> wrote:

>
>
>
>
> Hi there,
>
> Searched through the archives and couldn't find anything like this. Does
> anyone know if there's any properties like this proposed in CSS3?
>
> The min-width, max-width properties are excellent and add a lot to creating
> fluid layouts, however min-left would be invaluable.
>
> It would allow you to do things like this, for example placing a banner on
> the top right, but preventing it overlapping the logo on the left.
>
> #logo {
>   position: absolute;
>   top: 0;
>   left: 0;
>
>   width: 100px;
>   height: 70px;
> }
>
> #banner {
>   position: absolute;
>   top: 0;
>   right: 0;
>   min-left: 110px;
>
>   width: 700px;
>   height: 120px;
> }
>
> Would something like this be feasible at all?
>
> Regards,
>
> - Kevin
>

Well, when it actually becomes a reality the Template module will be exactly
what you need.  Using absolute positioning for layout is *still* a bit of a
hack (though a fairly stable one and imo much less of one than the float
abuse that often takes place) - Template will let you specify clearly that
you want two slots, with #logo filling the left one and #banner filling the
right one, and that you want the left slot to be at least 110px wide.

Now, that's years away, but it solves the *actual* problem you're having
(you need a proper form of layout control) rather than the particular issue
you're experiencing right now (absolutely positioned elements just barreling
over each other).

On that note, I've been curious about the Template module ever since I saw
it - it honestly seems to be a holy grail for designers (pun intended,
obviously).  It would finally free us from all the weirdness and hacks that
are float-based or absolute-positioning-based layouts and make the few
remaining reasons to do a table-based layout obsolete (mainly, a stable way
to generate equal-height columns), while greatly expanding our creative
options.  What's it's status, WG?

~TJ

Received on Friday, 11 July 2008 15:32:56 UTC