Grant, Melinda wrote: > > Maybe changing the 'must' above to a 'may' is a workable approach: "At-rules > inside @media may be ignored in CSS2.1 per 4.2 Rules for handling parsing errors." > That would allow css3 compliance without breaking 2.1 compliance. That's a pointless sentence. You're compliant whether you do or don't ignore the at-rules, so it's not adding anything meaningful. If CSS3's changes are a blocker here, then say that they *must* be ignored *unless* otherwise specified by a later CSS specification. ~fantasaiReceived on Thursday, 10 July 2008 06:18:49 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:10 GMT