W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2008

Re: Additional value for the visibility property

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 08:29:59 +1200
Message-ID: <11e306600807091329r144ab942p9a89362e7805ac38@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Andrew Fedoniouk" <news@terrainformatica.com>
Cc: "Ph. Wittenbergh" <jk7r-obt@asahi-net.or.jp>, "W3C Style List" <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 6:26 AM, Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>

> In this case we shall define something like "rendering is undefined" for
> the case when transparent element has not in-flow children.

Making rendering "undefined" is unacceptable when there's a perfectly
reasonable alternative.

You can try to write a spec for exactly what Opera does, but you'll find
it's significantly more complicated than just creating a stacking context
for the element with 'opacity'. Which is why I would argue that Opera's
behaviour is actually *not* more natural.

"He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities;
the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are
healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his
own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah
Received on Wednesday, 9 July 2008 20:30:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:27:38 UTC