W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2008

Re: [CSS21] stack level definitions in 9.9.1

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 13:42:43 -0700
Message-ID: <486D39C3.2060204@inkedblade.net>
To: Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net>
CC: www-style@w3.org

Anton Prowse wrote:
> 
> Ingo Chao's concerns are valid, as are those of expressed
> (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Oct/0017.html) by
> Roger Olsson in 2006.  In response to the latter, Mike Bremford stated
> (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Oct/0018.html) that
> 9.9.1 is "confusing, poorly worded, and correct."  Alas only the first
> two adjectives hold.
> ...
> Due to the number of problems involved, I have taken the unusual step of
> presenting and analysing them in a separate paper rather than treating
> them here on this mailing list:
> http://dev.moonhenge.net/css21/spec/z-index/ .  The paper presents
> several proposals for the clarification of the relevant sections of the
> specification. ...

Recorded as CSS2.1 Issue 60:
   http://csswg.inkedblade.net/spec/css2.1#issue-60

~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 3 July 2008 20:43:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:10 GMT