W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2008

Re: FW: Proposal: text-vertical-position property

From: Ambrose Li <ambrose.li@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 12:09:04 -0500
Message-ID: <af2cae770801270909w7ee6b83aqa13fe6aa589ef87b@mail.gmail.com>
To: "W3C Style List" <www-style@w3.org>

On 27/01/2008, Ben Cotterell <ben.cotterell@antplc.com> wrote:
> I also don't think you want to encourage glyphs to overflow inline
> boxes, because that looks bad if the inline boxes have backgrounds or
> borders.

On the other hand, for "fantasy" class fonts (esp. things like swash
capitals or alternate beginning/ending letters), the font designer
would have expected the glyphs to overflow the inline boxes,
and the page would look horrible if we insist that glyphs be always
contained within the inline boxes.

Can't have it both ways, I guess.

Yahoo and Gmail must die. Yes, I use them, but they still must die.
PS: Don't trust everything you read in Wikipedia. (Very Important)
Received on Sunday, 27 January 2008 17:09:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:27:33 UTC