Boris Zbarsky wrote: > > fantasai wrote: >> The constraint equation is the same, so some reference needs to be made >> to that. > > It wasn't at all obvious to me that this was what the text was trying to > say. It might be good to explicitly say something more like: > > In this case, Section 10.3.7 applies up through and including the > constraint equation, but the rest of section 10.3.7 is replaced > by the following: Recorded as Issue 29: http://csswg.inkedblade.net/spec/css2.1#issue-29 ~fantasaiReceived on Thursday, 17 January 2008 18:07:37 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:58 GMT