W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2008

Re[18]: css with attribues [software]

From: Dmitry Turin <sql4-en@narod.ru>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:27:39 +0200
Message-ID: <5195526562.20080117102739@narod.ru>
To: www-style@w3.org


>> +
DD> What?

I group your identical questions/objections and
enumerate them through '+'.
My answer after this enumeration is for all these
identical questions/objections.

>> 2) CAS stricturize thinking.
DD> I have no idea what this is supposed to mean.

Man with structurized thinking devide items into groups,
really adequate for corrent, concrete task.
Written language can promote or prevent this type of thinking.

CAS will allow to devide (attributes-properties) into groups
(unique items, common items), really adequate for
CORRENT, CONCRETE task (site).


>>>>             <link href="a.css" type="text/css">
>>>>             <link href="a.cas" type="text/cas">
>> DD> Making this an entirely different language would be a more
>> DD> reasonable approach.
>> User gets benefit (unnecessary to keep separation in brain),
DD> Who is the user? The author or the visitor?


>> machine gets loss (necessity to update tree by attributes from css).
>> Total: benefits of user is more important, than uncomfort of machine.
DD> I'd say that this would make life more complicated for authors

I'm accepting your argument.
Let attributes in css will be media-specific.
I'm listen your objections for this variant.


DD> separation of concerns is a good thing
DD> It isn't difficult, it lets authors think about one thing at a time

Absolutely agreed !!

DD> "I am writing HTML, therefore I am entering content and describing its
DD> semantics".

No (and presentation also).

DD> "I am writing CSS, therefore I am describing how the
DD> semantics should be represented to the user".

Yes, but with redundant 'style='.

DD> CSS expert working on the look while HTML experts work on the content

My signature at the end of each letter is content or look ??!!

Multiple repeated attributes ON CONCRETE SITE are 'look' ONLY,
independently of how W3's officials specify them.

>> 1) CAS economize human efforts
DD> Not given the statement you responded to.
DD> presentation in CSS and semantics in HTML works just
DD> fine, with little duplication of effort

Please, multiply to quantity of population, than to quantity of
pages on sites - and you will get real number of duplications,
which are quite not little.

Dmitry Turin
SQL5      (5.9.1)  http://sql50.euro.ru
HTML6     (6.5.1)  http://html60.euro.ru
Unicode7  (7.2.1)  http://unicode70.euro.ru
Computer2 (2.0.2)  http://computer20.euro.ru
Received on Thursday, 17 January 2008 08:26:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:27:33 UTC