Boris Zbarsky wrote: > > fantasai wrote: >> Does replacing >> >> # This situation is similar to the previous one, except that the element >> # has an intrinsic width. The sequence of substitutions is now: >> >> with >> >> | This situation is similar to the previous one, except the sequence of >> | substitutions is now: >> >> solve the problem? > > As far as I'm concerned, yes. But what's the point of saying "this is > similar to the previous thing, but works completely differently, and > works like this:"? The constraint equation is the same, so some reference needs to be made to that. This wording makes that reference without making a big change. ~fantasaiReceived on Thursday, 17 January 2008 07:20:02 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:57 GMT