- From: Dmitry Turin <sql4-en@narod.ru>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:42:04 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
>> BZ> I'm not sure what David's (correct) comment about not being able to put a '#' in >> BZ> a tag name in well-formed XML has to do with what I said, which is that if you >> BZ> _do_ have a tag with a '#' in it, it can be selected by CSS. >> I'm not understanding, rephrase, please. BZ> I'm not sure what's unclear. Given this document: You english was very sophisticated :) . Only this. >> BZ> Adding a single '\' is "heavy"? Sorry, I don't buy it. >> Try to use it constantly (much more). BZ> Instead of changing the language to make it fractionally easier to use your BZ> preconceived delimiter, why not choose a better delimiter, if you think the BZ> single escape character is a significant burden? I took all imaged variants, all other delimiters already have semantic burden (e.g. <xxx&yyy> ), or not look as single tag (e.g. <xxx^yyy> ). Dmitry Turin SQL5 (5.9.1) http://sql50.euro.ru HTML6 (6.5.1) http://html60.euro.ru Unicode7 (7.2.1) http://unicode70.euro.ru Computer2 (2.0.2) http://computer20.euro.ru
Received on Friday, 11 January 2008 07:40:51 UTC