W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2008

Re[4]: a#val , [id="val"]

From: Dmitry Turin <sql4-en@narod.ru>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:42:04 +0200
Message-ID: <1597422359.20080111094204@narod.ru>
To: www-style@w3.org

>> BZ> I'm not sure what David's (correct) comment about not being able to put a '#' in
>> BZ> a tag name in well-formed XML has to do with what I said, which is that if you
>> BZ> _do_ have a tag with a '#' in it, it can be selected by CSS.
>> I'm not understanding, rephrase, please.
BZ> I'm not sure what's unclear.  Given this document:
You english was very sophisticated :) . Only this.

>> BZ> Adding a single '\' is "heavy"?  Sorry, I don't buy it.
>> Try to use it constantly (much more).
BZ> Instead of changing the language to make it fractionally easier to use your
BZ> preconceived delimiter, why not choose a better delimiter, if you think the
BZ> single escape character is a significant burden?
I took all imaged variants,
all other delimiters already have semantic burden (e.g. <xxx&yyy> ),
or not look as single tag (e.g. <xxx^yyy> ).



Dmitry Turin
SQL5      (5.9.1)  http://sql50.euro.ru
HTML6     (6.5.1)  http://html60.euro.ru
Unicode7  (7.2.1)  http://unicode70.euro.ru
Computer2 (2.0.2)  http://computer20.euro.ru
Received on Friday, 11 January 2008 07:40:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:57 GMT