W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2008

css with attribues (was: Re[2]: [CSS] Would be nice if...)

From: Dmitry Turin <sql4-en@narod.ru>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 11:29:07 +0200
Message-ID: <14999067781.20080110112907@narod.ru>
To: www-style@w3.org

David,

>> DD> Please, no. That would require every user agent to support style
>> DD> sheets before they could process documents.
>> 1) <style> ... </style> is not problem at all.
>> 2) downloading of css-file may occur during downloading html-document
>>    with simultaneously correction of displaying -
>>    compare with correction of document during simultaneously  
>> downloading
>>    of document and its <img>
DD> These points seem entirely unrelated to mine (which is that this
DD> would stop CSS being an optional presentation layer and turn it in to
DD> a mandatory semantic layer).
Objection does not work against <style> at all.
About css-file:

<head>
  <link href="1.txt" type="text/css" rel="stylesheet">
  <link href="2.txt" type="text/css" rel="stylesheet">
</head>

"1.txt" is usual css-file (optional),
"2.txt" is file with values of attributes (mandatory).
Look at download htm-file and "2.txt" as to downloading of _one_
documents, devided into two files.
Merging of "1.txt" and "2.txt", or separation into two css-files
(i.e. optimization) is deal of author of document.

I'm against to enter new values for @type or @rel _for this purpose_ ,
because brain will must keep this devision without any benefit.


Dmitry Turin
SQL5      (5.9.1)  http://sql50.euro.ru
HTML6     (6.5.1)  http://html60.euro.ru
Unicode7  (7.2.1)  http://unicode70.euro.ru
Computer2 (2.0.2)  http://computer20.euro.ru
Received on Thursday, 10 January 2008 09:28:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:57 GMT