Ingo Chao wrote: > There are two definitions of the term "stack level" in 9.9.1 > > A: "This integer is the stack level of the generated box in the > current stacking context" > > B: "Each box has an integer stack level, which is its position on the > z-axis relative to other boxes in the same stacking context." > > This coexistance continues in the overview of layers "Each stacking > context consists of the following stacking levels" [1.-7.] and > vanishes in Appendix E. > > Do the terms "stack level" in A and "stack level" in B have the same > meaning? I think they do because the spec says this: "Boxes with the same stack level in a stacking context are stacked back-to-front according to document tree order." Is there something that doesn't make sense if you interpret them as meaning the same thing? ~fantasaiReceived on Thursday, 3 January 2008 01:33:41 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:57 GMT