- From: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@exchange.microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 12:44:28 -0800
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Yes, I did in fact mean "inline element", not inline block. Sorry... I don't think there is anything ambiguous about inline blocks as containers... -----Original Message----- From: L. David Baron [mailto:dbaron@dbaron.org] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 12:39 PM To: Alex Mogilevsky Cc: www-style@w3.org Subject: Re: [CSS2.1 position:relative] Blocks Contained in Inline Relative. Er, did you mean inline or inline-block? You wrote inline block here (but maybe meant inline box?): On Thursday 2008-02-07 11:59 -0800, Alex Mogilevsky wrote: > When a block with a static position is contained in an inline block with "position:relative", should the relative offset apply to it? ...but then wrote inline here: > 10.1. http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visudet.html#containing-block-details > Clearly says that the relative inline is clearly not the containing block for nested blocks. I think I answered the question assuming you meant inline and fantasai answered it assuming you meant inline-block. -David -- L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Thursday, 7 February 2008 20:44:43 UTC