W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2008

Re: [css3-namespace] Introduction section and references

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 15:56:21 +0900
Cc: www-style@w3.org
Message-Id: <66CCB633-A714-4195-9FA2-8FBFA37C6AC1@w3.org>
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>


Le 7 févr. 2008 à 07:37, fantasai a écrit :
> karl@w3.org wrote:
>> Hi, This is a QA Review comment for "CSS Module: Namespaces" http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-css3-namespace-20060828/ 
>>  2006-08-28 2nd WD
>> About http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-css3-namespace-20060828/#intro
>> [[[ The terminology used in this specification is that of [XML- 
>> NAMES11]. ]]]
>> * The link given for [XML-NAMES11] is [Namespaces in XML 1.1, 4  
>> February 2004][1]. The document
>> has been republished since and the last version is "Namespaces in  
>> XML 1.1 (Second Edition)"
>> published on August 16, 2006. Update your document for correct links.
>> * The reference for "Namespaces in XML 1.1" is given in the  
>> Informative references section. If
>> the intent of the WG is to use the nomenclature of XML Namespaces  
>> 1.1 with a proper meaning. It
>> is not anymore an informative reference, then the reference MUST be  
>> in the normative references
>> section.
>> * Then Later on in the document in Section 3 "Declaring Namespaces: 
>> …" there is a reference to XML
>> Namespaces [REC-XML-NAMES] which is yet another version of XML  
>> Namespaces. Be consistent in your
>> references to XML Namespaces.
>> [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xml-names11-20040204/
>
> The references have all been changed to Namespaces in XML 1.0.
>  http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-namespace/
>
> Please let us know if this addresses your comment.


Yes it does. Thanks.

--
Karl Dubost - W3C
http://www.w3.org/QA/
Be Strict To Be Cool
Received on Thursday, 7 February 2008 06:56:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:01 GMT