Agreed : I wasn't in any sense arguing against the idea (the more clustering possibilities, the better, IMHO); I was just trying to explain it for Daniel's benefit. ** Phil. -------- Jens Meiert wrote: >>> I am sorry but I don't understand at all your >>> >>> .old = .new >> Isn't ".old = .new" just a convenient alternative >> to ".old, .new {}" ? > > Exactly. The more occurrences and the longer the selectors, the more “convenient” though: > > .old = .new; > .new {} > .new, .somethingelse {} > .new, .different {} > .new, .whatever {} >Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2008 17:03:40 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:01 GMT