W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2008

Re: [css3] Suggestion: Selector variables or “synonyms”

From: Philip Taylor (Webmaster) <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:03:06 +0000
Message-ID: <47A9E84A.4090106@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
To: Jens Meiert <jens.meiert@erde3.com>
CC: daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com, www-style@w3.org

Agreed : I wasn't in any sense arguing
against the idea (the more clustering
possibilities, the better, IMHO); I was
just trying to explain it for Daniel's
benefit.

** Phil.
--------
Jens Meiert wrote:
>>> I am sorry but I don't understand at all your
>>>
>>>   .old = .new
>> Isn't ".old = .new" just a convenient alternative
>> to ".old, .new {}" ?
> 
> Exactly. The more occurrences and the longer the selectors, the more “convenient” though:
> 
>   .old = .new;
>   .new {}
>   .new, .somethingelse {}
>   .new, .different {}
>   .new, .whatever {}
> 
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2008 17:03:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:01 GMT