W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2008

Re: [css3] Suggestion: Selector variables or “synonyms”

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:55:42 +0100
To: "Philip Taylor (Webmaster)" <P.Taylor@rhul.ac.uk>, "Daniel Glazman" <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
Cc: "Jens Meiert" <jens.meiert@erde3.com>, www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.t533y4ii64w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>

On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:47:54 +0100, Philip Taylor (Webmaster)  
<P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk> wrote:
> Daniel Glazman wrote:
>>  I am sorry but I don't understand at all your
>>    .old = .new
>>  thing. I get the "@H = I" one but not the one above.
>> Can you please make it a bit clearer, possibly give
>> a concrete example ? Thanks.
>
> Isn't ".old = .new" just a convenient alternative
> to ".old, .new {}" ?

Is it? I didn't get the proposal/suggestion.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2008 16:53:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:01 GMT