- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 12:24:17 +0100
- To: "Grant, Melinda" <melinda.grant@hp.com>, Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
- Cc: "Dean Jackson" <dino@apple.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 23:54:13 +0100, Grant, Melinda <melinda.grant@hp.com> wrote: > Anne said: >> Yeah, for <video> image-* doesn't seem so appropriate. > > Hmmm, I don't follow. 'Image' covers both still images and dynamic > images, no? On the other hand, 'content' would also include text and > other things this property wouldn't apply to. The group considered > 're-fit' and 're-position' (short for 'replaced element'), but we > rejected those because we wanted to give authors more of a clue about > what the property does. I guess image-* works. I think it will be slightly confusing for authors, but they'll get used to it and hopefully we pick the defaults for <video> in a way that authors typically don't have to bother. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 24 December 2008 11:25:07 UTC