W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2008

Re: no-cascade proposition

From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:21:45 +0000
Message-ID: <493E2A99.8040601@david-woolley.me.uk>
To: www-style@w3.org

Jens Meiert wrote:
>> <css selector> {cascade:no-cascade;}
> 
> Independent of existing comments, I'd still like to know what parts of
> the cascade that should exactly "disable" [1].

I think the OP is confusing cascading and inheritance, but even then, 
the effect he wants to achieve requires disabling certain selectors and 
they need to be clear how that is done.



-- 
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Tuesday, 9 December 2008 08:22:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:17 GMT