W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2008

Re: @media and browsers conditional statments

From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 08:29:10 +0100
Message-ID: <489FEA46.6050003@david-woolley.me.uk>
To: CSS 3 W3C Group <www-style@w3.org>

Brad Kemper wrote:
> Nor would I, but spoofing is just so unlikely. This is not JavaScript in 
> the 90s. Things have progressed since then. Those authors who have not 
> progressed are blissfully unaware of more modern css features anyway. I 

This is largely a human factors problem and, whilst one may get fashion 
cycles, one shouldn't expect basic human nature to change over these 
time scales.

Changes will take place as a result of shifts in the age profile and 
because more people are going through academic training, but there are 
still a lot of new inexperienced people, and a lot whose training is 
limited to glossy cook books and looking at other people's solutions.

-- 
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Monday, 11 August 2008 07:28:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:11 GMT