W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2008

Re: border-radius

From: Brad Kemper <brkemper.comcast@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 21:40:59 -0700
Cc: Nick_Hofstede@inventivegroup.com, www-style@w3.org
Message-Id: <1B394502-D243-4602-BD9B-051AA2C7D4D2@gmail.com>
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>

On Aug 10, 2008, at 9:17 PM, fantasai wrote:

> Nick_Hofstede@inventivegroup.com wrote:
>> Could someone explain why it's impossible to apply border-radius to  
>> a table element with border-collapse set to collapse?
>> Why can't the border conflict resolution rules be updated with  
>> something like: "If border styles only differ in border-radius,  
>> then a style set on a cell wins over one on a row, which wins over  
>> a row group, column, column group and, lastly, table."
>
> Added as ISSUE-55
>  http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Tracker/issues/55
>
> I think border-radius should get ignored when applied to internal
> table elements in border-collapse mode, but it makes sense for it
> to apply to the table element itself.

Why not have TDs with border radii in which the straight, horizontal  
and vertical parts of the borders can collapse into shared borders?
Received on Monday, 11 August 2008 04:46:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:11 GMT