W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2008

Re: text-overflow: ellipsis

From: Ambrose Li <ambrose.li@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 23:16:44 -0400
Message-ID: <af2cae770808052016n6494e86cl4601000dae4be720@mail.gmail.com>
To: "James Elmore" <James.Elmore@cox.net>
Cc: "Christoph Päper" <christoph.paeper@crissov.de>, "W3C style mailing list" <www-style@w3.org>

2008/8/5 James Elmore <James.Elmore@cox.net>:
> That is something I want to interject in this discussion. While not an
> expert in typography, I am aware that an ellipsis may fulfill several
> functions. As Christoph pointed out, two of those functions are: indicating
> missing words and indicating missing letters. (I am speaking about English,
> and probably other Western languages as well in these cases.) If there is a
> space before the ellipsis, the preceding is a complete word and the removed
> chunks are probably words as well. If there is no space before the dots, the
> missing pieces are assumed to be letters and a complete word is NOT the last
> thing on the line (before the dots).

AFAIK, in English typography, the ellipsis ONLY serves to fill in missing words;
it is never used for filling in missing letters (which is a job
traditionally performed
by, iirc, some sort of a dash).


The 'net used to be run by smart people; now many sites are run by
idiots. So SAD... (Sites that do spam filtering on mails sent to the
abuse contact need to be cut off the net...)
Received on Wednesday, 6 August 2008 03:17:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:27:39 UTC