Brian J. Fink wrote: > And don't forget, I'd like the caret (^) used for the Indirect > Ancestor selector. We're more likely to choose a syntax that lets you change which part of the selector you're matching against. That way it generalizes to all the combinators. See the discussions linked from http://csswg.inkedblade.net/spec/selectors4 ~fantasaiReceived on Tuesday, 29 April 2008 00:40:01 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:05 GMT