- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:18:55 +0200
- To: "Garrett Smith" <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com>
- Cc: Www-style <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 03:54:31 +0200, Garrett Smith <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com> wrote: > bump. I believe I already explained why I disagree with you on the matters you keep re-raising on this mailing list. I think it is useful to standardize on what browsers need to implement and the only way to get there is by having a definition that disagrees with current implementations. If implementations are not able to change their implementations I'm sure we'll get feedback to that effect in due course. During Last Call or Candidate Recommendation stage for instance as we'll need two fully interoperable implementations to proceed to W3C Recommendation stage. So far there's been no such feedback from implementors and so far there's been no proposal for a better algorithm that could be placed in the specification so I think we're fine. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Monday, 21 April 2008 13:19:23 UTC