fantasai wrote: > Are you saying that would also be necessary with > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0024.html > or are you saying something else? I'm saying that what needs to happen here needs to be clearly defined and unambiguous, and needs to be compatible with existing HTML content. The proposal at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0024.html seems acceptable to me for these purposes. It'll be a bit of a pain to implement when the text is "white-space: pre" and split over multiple textnodes, some of which are whitespace-only and some are not... But then again, the whole thing about anonymous table box generation is a major pain to implement, so this might be no worse. There should certainly be some careful tests for this in the CSS 2.1 test suite... -BorisReceived on Wednesday, 9 April 2008 01:35:05 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 April 2008 01:35:07 GMT