- From: Christoph Päper <christoph.paeper@crissov.de>
- Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 00:08:31 +0200
- To: CSS Style <www-style@w3.org>
Daniel Glazman: > http://disruptive-innovations.com/zoo/cssvariables/ | RQ4 | Calls to a variable in the assignment of the value of a property should | make the corresponding CSS declaration invalid in a non-conformant | legacy browser, the CSS error handling rules allowing then a fallback | to a regular CSS Level 2 rule. This requirement is not necessary with my idea of overwritable (and some new) keywords. It is not as universally usable as your proposal and requires more than one new at-rule, but it degrades much better and type mismatches or unknown values have to be handled only at instantiation. Authors will probably like your proposal better, though, because of its powerfulness, but I'm afraid this makes it also more prone to bugs. <http://www.w3.org/mid/EF8B8B3C-5AA3-4A30-B22E-5BCCD6BAFB18@crissov.de> <http://www.w3.org/mid/3B685382-492E-4095-9DCF-6E1DD040DFFC@crissov.de>
Received on Tuesday, 8 April 2008 22:08:59 UTC