W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2008

Re: fallback color for background-image (ISSUE-5)

From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 07:51:15 +0100
Message-ID: <47FB15E3.2090908@david-woolley.me.uk>
To: www-style@w3.org

Patrick Garies wrote:
> 

> 
> Feel free to clear things up; if you were saying that a subsequent h1 
> rule (or a previous !important h1 rule) could override a previous (or a 
> subsequent) @missing h1 rule, you’re, of course, right, but then that 
> would simply be an authoring issue, rather than an issue with the proposal.

In overriding it, it could introduce an image that was fetchable, or 
cancel the need for an image, resulting in inappropriate workaround for 
the missing image.

Authors cannot avoid this because, in practice the cascade allows the 
user to override them in ways that they cannot control, and, in 
principle, they should not be relying on their style sheet not be 
affected by other author style sheets.

PS please do not request read receipts on public mailing lists; it's an 
invasion of privacy.  (In this case, the list software seems to have 
disabled the receipt request in the version actually sent to the list, 
but you cannot rely on that.)

-- 
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Tuesday, 8 April 2008 06:52:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:04 GMT