Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > ... > E > F [ok] > E + F [no] > ... > > For which I would naturally call the methods on an empty document or > an isolated element. Quite frankly even then this is a lot nicer then > doing something like > > if (document.supportsSelector(DocumentSelector.CSS_TYPE_SELECTOR) && > document.supportsSelector(DocumentSelector.CSS_CHILD_COMBINER)) > ... > > As has been suggested initially in this thread. Why do you need to query support for > and +. Only IE6/Win and earlier would need to be queried. What other implementation doesn't support descendant or sibling selectors? AlanReceived on Monday, 7 April 2008 17:13:24 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:04 GMT