- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 21:18:29 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
The editor's draft at
http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-mediaqueries/#orientation gives the
examples:
# @media all and (portrait) { ... }
# @media all and (landscape) { ... }
However, I couldn't find any normative text allowing the value to be
used without the feature. I would think that '(orientation)' is a
valid expression (always true), and '(orientation: portrait)' is
also valid, but I don't see anything allowing '(portrait)'. Should
these examples include the "orientation: "? Or was this additional
shorthand form intended to be allowed?
(Allowing it seems like it would reduce future extensibility.
However, since this is just syntactic sugar for aspect-ratio, I'm
not sure that's a real concern. However, it is extra work for
implementations.)
-David
--
L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/
Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Monday, 7 April 2008 04:19:31 UTC