W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2008

Re: fallback color for background-image (ISSUE-5)

From: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2008 01:24:48 +1100
Message-ID: <47F63A30.5030607@css-class.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
CC: www-style@w3.org

Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> I think it would make sense if it was more trivial to specify a fallback 
> color then by using
>   background:transparent / red url(...);
> the first being optional would already be more useful
>   background:/ red url(...);
> and would align more with what I do now some cases
>   background:url(...);
> (It has been suggested that "/ red" is not pretty. In that case we 
> should probably think of something better :-))

So the slash / would indicate that a UA falls back to the transparent 
background? Is this for users who have disabled background images? Can 
you clearly define why you in some cases use this?


This seems consisted with my use of (or similar).

background: url(real.png), url(...);



Received on Friday, 4 April 2008 14:26:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:04 GMT